New exposure-based metric approach for evaluating O(3) risk to North American aspen forests.
Identifieur interne : 003B13 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 003B12; suivant : 003B14New exposure-based metric approach for evaluating O(3) risk to North American aspen forests.
Auteurs : K E Percy [Canada] ; M. Nosal ; W. Heilman ; T. Dann ; J. Sober ; A H Legge ; D F KarnoskySource :
- Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) [ 0269-7491 ] ; 2007.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Amérique du Nord (MeSH), Analyse de régression (MeSH), Appréciation des risques (méthodes), Exposition environnementale (effets indésirables), Incertitude (MeSH), Modèles statistiques (MeSH), Oxydants photochimiques (toxicité), Ozone (toxicité), Pollution de l'air (effets indésirables), Populus (croissance et développement), Populus (effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques), Saisons (MeSH), Surveillance de l'environnement (méthodes).
- MESH :
- croissance et développement : Populus.
- effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques : Populus.
- effets indésirables : Exposition environnementale, Pollution de l'air.
- méthodes : Appréciation des risques, Surveillance de l'environnement.
- toxicité : Oxydants photochimiques, Ozone.
- Amérique du Nord, Analyse de régression, Incertitude, Modèles statistiques, Saisons.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Air Pollution (adverse effects), Environmental Exposure (adverse effects), Environmental Monitoring (methods), Models, Statistical (MeSH), North America (MeSH), Oxidants, Photochemical (toxicity), Ozone (toxicity), Populus (drug effects), Populus (growth & development), Regression Analysis (MeSH), Risk Assessment (methods), Seasons (MeSH), Uncertainty (MeSH).
- MESH :
- chemical , toxicity : Oxidants, Photochemical, Ozone.
- geographic : North America.
- adverse effects : Air Pollution, Environmental Exposure.
- drug effects : Populus.
- growth & development : Populus.
- methods : Environmental Monitoring, Risk Assessment.
- Models, Statistical, Regression Analysis, Seasons, Uncertainty.
Abstract
The United States and Canada currently use exposure-based metrics to protect vegetation from O(3). Using 5 years (1999-2003) of co-measured O(3), meteorology and growth response, we have developed exposure-based regression models that predict Populus tremuloides growth change within the North American ambient air quality context. The models comprised growing season fourth-highest daily maximum 8-h average O(3) concentration, growing degree days, and wind speed. They had high statistical significance, high goodness of fit, include 95% confidence intervals for tree growth change, and are simple to use. Averaged across a wide range of clonal sensitivity, historical 2001-2003 growth change over most of the 26 Mha P. tremuloides distribution was estimated to have ranged from no impact (0%) to strong negative impacts (-31%). With four aspen clones responding negatively (one responded positively) to O(3), the growing season fourth-highest daily maximum 8-h average O(3) concentration performed much better than growing season SUM06, AOT40 or maximum 1h average O(3) concentration metrics as a single indicator of aspen stem cross-sectional area growth.
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.10.009
PubMed: 17140714
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">New exposure-based metric approach for evaluating O(3) risk to North American aspen forests.</title><author><name sortKey="Percy, K E" sort="Percy, K E" uniqKey="Percy K" first="K E" last="Percy">K E Percy</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service-Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton, Canada. kpercy@nrcan.gc.ca</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service-Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Fredericton</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nosal, M" sort="Nosal, M" uniqKey="Nosal M" first="M" last="Nosal">M. Nosal</name></author><author><name sortKey="Heilman, W" sort="Heilman, W" uniqKey="Heilman W" first="W" last="Heilman">W. Heilman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dann, T" sort="Dann, T" uniqKey="Dann T" first="T" last="Dann">T. Dann</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sober, J" sort="Sober, J" uniqKey="Sober J" first="J" last="Sober">J. Sober</name></author><author><name sortKey="Legge, A H" sort="Legge, A H" uniqKey="Legge A" first="A H" last="Legge">A H Legge</name></author><author><name sortKey="Karnosky, D F" sort="Karnosky, D F" uniqKey="Karnosky D" first="D F" last="Karnosky">D F Karnosky</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2007">2007</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:17140714</idno><idno type="pmid">17140714</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2006.10.009</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">003C67</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003C67</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003C67</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">003C67</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">003C67</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">New exposure-based metric approach for evaluating O(3) risk to North American aspen forests.</title><author><name sortKey="Percy, K E" sort="Percy, K E" uniqKey="Percy K" first="K E" last="Percy">K E Percy</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service-Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton, Canada. kpercy@nrcan.gc.ca</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service-Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Fredericton</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nosal, M" sort="Nosal, M" uniqKey="Nosal M" first="M" last="Nosal">M. Nosal</name></author><author><name sortKey="Heilman, W" sort="Heilman, W" uniqKey="Heilman W" first="W" last="Heilman">W. Heilman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dann, T" sort="Dann, T" uniqKey="Dann T" first="T" last="Dann">T. Dann</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sober, J" sort="Sober, J" uniqKey="Sober J" first="J" last="Sober">J. Sober</name></author><author><name sortKey="Legge, A H" sort="Legge, A H" uniqKey="Legge A" first="A H" last="Legge">A H Legge</name></author><author><name sortKey="Karnosky, D F" sort="Karnosky, D F" uniqKey="Karnosky D" first="D F" last="Karnosky">D F Karnosky</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)</title><idno type="ISSN">0269-7491</idno><imprint><date when="2007" type="published">2007</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Air Pollution (adverse effects)</term><term>Environmental Exposure (adverse effects)</term><term>Environmental Monitoring (methods)</term><term>Models, Statistical (MeSH)</term><term>North America (MeSH)</term><term>Oxidants, Photochemical (toxicity)</term><term>Ozone (toxicity)</term><term>Populus (drug effects)</term><term>Populus (growth & development)</term><term>Regression Analysis (MeSH)</term><term>Risk Assessment (methods)</term><term>Seasons (MeSH)</term><term>Uncertainty (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Amérique du Nord (MeSH)</term><term>Analyse de régression (MeSH)</term><term>Appréciation des risques (méthodes)</term><term>Exposition environnementale (effets indésirables)</term><term>Incertitude (MeSH)</term><term>Modèles statistiques (MeSH)</term><term>Oxydants photochimiques (toxicité)</term><term>Ozone (toxicité)</term><term>Pollution de l'air (effets indésirables)</term><term>Populus (croissance et développement)</term><term>Populus (effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques)</term><term>Saisons (MeSH)</term><term>Surveillance de l'environnement (méthodes)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="toxicity" xml:lang="en"><term>Oxidants, Photochemical</term><term>Ozone</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>North America</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Air Pollution</term><term>Environmental Exposure</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="croissance et développement" xml:lang="fr"><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="drug effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques" xml:lang="fr"><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="effets indésirables" xml:lang="fr"><term>Exposition environnementale</term><term>Pollution de l'air</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en"><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Environmental Monitoring</term><term>Risk Assessment</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Appréciation des risques</term><term>Surveillance de l'environnement</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="toxicité" xml:lang="fr"><term>Oxydants photochimiques</term><term>Ozone</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Models, Statistical</term><term>Regression Analysis</term><term>Seasons</term><term>Uncertainty</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Amérique du Nord</term><term>Analyse de régression</term><term>Incertitude</term><term>Modèles statistiques</term><term>Saisons</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The United States and Canada currently use exposure-based metrics to protect vegetation from O(3). Using 5 years (1999-2003) of co-measured O(3), meteorology and growth response, we have developed exposure-based regression models that predict Populus tremuloides growth change within the North American ambient air quality context. The models comprised growing season fourth-highest daily maximum 8-h average O(3) concentration, growing degree days, and wind speed. They had high statistical significance, high goodness of fit, include 95% confidence intervals for tree growth change, and are simple to use. Averaged across a wide range of clonal sensitivity, historical 2001-2003 growth change over most of the 26 Mha P. tremuloides distribution was estimated to have ranged from no impact (0%) to strong negative impacts (-31%). With four aspen clones responding negatively (one responded positively) to O(3), the growing season fourth-highest daily maximum 8-h average O(3) concentration performed much better than growing season SUM06, AOT40 or maximum 1h average O(3) concentration metrics as a single indicator of aspen stem cross-sectional area growth.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">17140714</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2007</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>23</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>21</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0269-7491</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>147</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2007</Year><Month>Jun</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Environ Pollut</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>New exposure-based metric approach for evaluating O(3) risk to North American aspen forests.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>554-66</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The United States and Canada currently use exposure-based metrics to protect vegetation from O(3). Using 5 years (1999-2003) of co-measured O(3), meteorology and growth response, we have developed exposure-based regression models that predict Populus tremuloides growth change within the North American ambient air quality context. The models comprised growing season fourth-highest daily maximum 8-h average O(3) concentration, growing degree days, and wind speed. They had high statistical significance, high goodness of fit, include 95% confidence intervals for tree growth change, and are simple to use. Averaged across a wide range of clonal sensitivity, historical 2001-2003 growth change over most of the 26 Mha P. tremuloides distribution was estimated to have ranged from no impact (0%) to strong negative impacts (-31%). With four aspen clones responding negatively (one responded positively) to O(3), the growing season fourth-highest daily maximum 8-h average O(3) concentration performed much better than growing season SUM06, AOT40 or maximum 1h average O(3) concentration metrics as a single indicator of aspen stem cross-sectional area growth.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Percy</LastName><ForeName>K E</ForeName><Initials>KE</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service-Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton, Canada. kpercy@nrcan.gc.ca</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Nosal</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Heilman</LastName><ForeName>W</ForeName><Initials>W</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dann</LastName><ForeName>T</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sober</LastName><ForeName>J</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Legge</LastName><ForeName>A H</ForeName><Initials>AH</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Karnosky</LastName><ForeName>D F</ForeName><Initials>DF</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>29</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Environ Pollut</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8804476</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0269-7491</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D010083">Oxidants, Photochemical</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>66H7ZZK23N</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D010126">Ozone</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000397" MajorTopicYN="N">Air Pollution</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="N">adverse effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004781" MajorTopicYN="N">Environmental Exposure</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="N">adverse effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004784" MajorTopicYN="N">Environmental Monitoring</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015233" MajorTopicYN="N">Models, Statistical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009656" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">North America</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010083" MajorTopicYN="N">Oxidants, Photochemical</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000633" MajorTopicYN="Y">toxicity</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010126" MajorTopicYN="N">Ozone</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000633" MajorTopicYN="Y">toxicity</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="N">drug effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012044" MajorTopicYN="N">Regression Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018570" MajorTopicYN="N">Risk Assessment</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012621" MajorTopicYN="N">Seasons</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D035501" MajorTopicYN="N">Uncertainty</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2006</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>30</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2006</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>09</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2006</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>11</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2006</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2007</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>24</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2006</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17140714</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0269-7491(06)00569-0</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2006.10.009</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Canada</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Dann, T" sort="Dann, T" uniqKey="Dann T" first="T" last="Dann">T. Dann</name><name sortKey="Heilman, W" sort="Heilman, W" uniqKey="Heilman W" first="W" last="Heilman">W. Heilman</name><name sortKey="Karnosky, D F" sort="Karnosky, D F" uniqKey="Karnosky D" first="D F" last="Karnosky">D F Karnosky</name><name sortKey="Legge, A H" sort="Legge, A H" uniqKey="Legge A" first="A H" last="Legge">A H Legge</name><name sortKey="Nosal, M" sort="Nosal, M" uniqKey="Nosal M" first="M" last="Nosal">M. Nosal</name><name sortKey="Sober, J" sort="Sober, J" uniqKey="Sober J" first="J" last="Sober">J. Sober</name></noCountry><country name="Canada"><noRegion><name sortKey="Percy, K E" sort="Percy, K E" uniqKey="Percy K" first="K E" last="Percy">K E Percy</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003B13 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 003B13 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:17140714
|texte= New exposure-based metric approach for evaluating O(3) risk to North American aspen forests.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17140714" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |